Last update: 2/25/2005
Photography is my hobby. I own several cameras, most of which use the
Pentax K mount, but I've also got a few others, including a Soviet
Kristall that uses the Zenit M39 mount. In an effort to determine the
quality of various lenses I own, I did a simple and informal test: I
loaded a Zenit APk camera with Ilford Pan F+ ISO 50 film, mounted it on a
tripod, and shot a test scene with nine lenses. Note that this is a
The Tamrons used Ricoh K-mount adapters and the Zenit M39 lenses used both M39-to-M42 and M42-to-K-mount adapters.
I shot a piece of 8.5"x11" paper with the lens name, slightly off center, for each lens. For the wide angle and normal lenses, I shot at f/5.6, but for the longer lenses, I used f/8 because f/5.6 was just too close to the Tamron's maximum aperture. I let the Zenit APk's exposure meter determine the shutter speed. (The day was mostly clear, but a few stray clouds changed the light slightly during the course of the test.) I tested the Tamron 28-70mm twice, once at 35mm and once at 50mm. I tested the Tamron 70-210mm at 135mm, to compare it directly with the fixed lenses of roughly that length. I moved the camera on its tripod when switching between different classes of lens lengths to approximate the same view for each lens type.
I developed the film myself in Kodak D-76. This was only the second roll of film I've developed myself, and I had problems with the reels on the tank. This resulted in some film buckling that caused crescent-shaped artifacts on some of the frames. I scanned the negatives with a Minolta DiMAGE Scan Elite 5400 at 2700 dpi using VueScan.
I've grouped the results on three sub-pages:
To sum up, the winners in each category were the Mir-1, the Helios-44K-4, and the Pentax Takumar 135mm.
I've also written a page with some informal scanner tests.
If you have problems with or comments about this web page, please e-mail me at firstname.lastname@example.org. Thanks.
Return to my main web page.